Legal Opinion

Wayne C. Holden Corp. v. Verheul

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1989No. 13-88-277-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

DORSEY, Justice.

Having granted appellant’s timely motion for rehearing, we withdraw our original opinion issued December 30, 1988, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

This is an appeal from the appointment of a receiver to operate oil and gas properties. The primary issue is whether the trial judge abused his discretion in failing to call a recess in the trial for four hours when appellant’s counsel was unable to appear. We hold the trial judge abused his discretion and reverse and remand.

Appellee, Kees Verheul, originally brought suit against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Villegas v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CrankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gendebien v. GendebienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Pitts v. GFC CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Arensberg v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waste Water, Inc. v. Alpha Finishing & Developing Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Joe and Sue Shell v. Austin Rehearsal Complex, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API