Legal Opinion

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. George W. Craig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 2, 1965No. 14960_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The gravamen of the petition for rehearing is that the court erred in concluding that there was no denial of the defendant Craig’s right to counsel. More particularly, as we view it, the issue presented is whether the right to counsel is denied when a confession is elicited outside the presence of counsel whose assistance has previously been invoked by the accused? As was found in our opinion filed June 30, 1965, 348 F.2d 22: (1) the accused had conferred with his attorney prior to confessing; (2) the accused was aware of his right to have his attorney available for further consultations; (3)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. George W. Craig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard ConeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. People v. Stephen J. B.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. Charles Winfield WestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Marden A. Mayes v. Maurice H. Sigler, Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  5. Betrand AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API