Legal Opinion

Fort Worth Star-Telegram v. Street

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 2001No. 2-01-105-CVPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Star-Telegram, Inc., and Star-Telegram Newspaper, Inc., D/B/A Fort Worth Star-Telegram (collectively “the Star-Telegram”), appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. Appellee, John Street, sued the Star-Telegram for libel arising from a Letter to the Editor published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. The letter addressed the 1992 general election for the office of Judge, 48th District Court, Tarrant County, Texas. Specifically, the letter focused on Street’s campaign signs.

In this…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Wallbuilder Presentations, Inc. ex rel. BartonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Jain v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Kaufman v. Islamic Society of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Cox Texas Newspapers, L.P. v. Penick, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  5. Shell Cortez Pipeline Co. v. ShoresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API