George Woods v. Johnny Hill, Et Ux
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
F' t E D OF A, PPEALS C', VS, 0if`f lY ; r a 2 3'1iR1 ffi¢ 2J AP, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF W DIVISION II GEORGE WOODS, No. 438: Respondent, N. JOHNNY HILL and MELINDA HILL, husband and wife, UNPUBLISHED OPINION ts. WORSWICK, C. J. — Johnny Hill and Malinda Hill appeal the trial court' s judgment ordering the Hills to pay George Woods damages, after Woods sued the Hills for breach of a contract for the purchase and sale of a FedEx van and FedEx delivery route. The Hills raised the affirmative defenses of impossibility, interference with performance, fraud, unclean hands, and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.