Legal Opinion

George Woods v. Johnny Hill, Et Ux

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 25, 2014No. 43824-1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

F' t E D OF A, PPEALS C', VS, 0if`f lY ; r a 2 3'1iR1 ffi¢ 2J AP, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF W DIVISION II GEORGE WOODS, No. 438: Respondent, N. JOHNNY HILL and MELINDA HILL, husband and wife, UNPUBLISHED OPINION ts. WORSWICK, C. J. — Johnny Hill and Malinda Hill appeal the trial court' s judgment ordering the Hills to pay George Woods damages, after Woods sued the Hills for breach of a contract for the purchase and sale of a FedEx van and FedEx delivery route. The Hills raised the affirmative defenses of impossibility, interference with performance, fraud, unclean hands, and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API