Legal Opinion

Warpinski v. State Industrial Insurance System

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1987No. 17528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Joseph Warpinski sought to reopen a worker’s compensation claim after suffering a non-industrial aggravation of a prior com-pensable injury. The Nevada Industrial Commission, 1 the appeals officer and the district court all agreed the claim could not be reopened. Warpinski appeals.

In 1972, Warpinski experienced a sharp back pain while lifting equipment in the course of his employment as a medical technician. The injury was diagnosed as a herniated nucleus pulposus at the L5-S1 level of the spine. Warpinski underwent surgery to remove part of the intervertebral disk. He was compensated…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of GrableOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Industrial Insurance System v. SwinneyNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Guidry v. J & R Eads Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Kelly v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. Hughes v. General Motors Guide Lamp Div.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. United Exposition Service Co. v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ex Parte Pike County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. SAPKO v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. Lou Grubb Chevrolet, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Chappaz v. Golden NuggetNevada Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API