United States v. Sacein Rouhana Farhat
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Criminal prosecution by the United States against Sacein Rouhana Farhat. On motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
Two indictments, Nos. 1349 and 1348, were returned at the same time against the defendant. Indictment No. 1349, consisting of a single count, was laid under the Act of October 28, 1919, known as the National Prohibition or Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305), and charges that he unlawfully and willfully manufactured at his residence for beverage purposes whisky containing more than one-half of 1 per cent, of alcohol by volume, without having obtained a permit or authorization so to do. He entered a plea of guilty and was fined.
Indictment No. 1348 charges, in the first count,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gavieres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Morgan v. DevineSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maresca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Fontenot v. AccardoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- State v. . McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. CorbittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- United States v. St. ClairDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.