Legal Opinion

Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Perron

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 23, 1934No. 5053PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Appellant seeks to reverse a judgment in favor of appellee as plaintiff in a suit upon an insurance policy upon the life of Leo P. Perron, now deceased. Two errors are assigned, viz., that appellant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been allowed and that the court erred in its charge to the jury.

Appellant, by special pleas, asserted falsity of statements made by the insured in answer to questions 9, 10, and 13 of the application and in the final paragraph thereto, and insisted that they constituted fraudulent misrepresentations of material facts, barring…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Fountain & Herrington, Inc. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. BoldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  4. Haddad v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Farrell v. Security Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pence v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hesselberg v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. Pence v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API