Legal Opinion
Richard O'Neill v. Town of Nantucket
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 13, 1983No. 82-1744PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI,
Senior District Judge.
The issue here raised is whether the defendant Town of Nantucket violated the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by revoking the plaintiff O’Neill’s license to operate at a particular place amusement machines without having given the plaintiff a right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
On December 31, 1981 the Town of Nantucket, Massachusetts, acting in attempted compliance with authority conferred by Mass.Gen.Laws Ann. ch. 140, § 177A, licensed the plaintiff O’Neill to operate coin-operated electronic machines on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Marshfield Family Skateland, Inc. v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- O'NEILL v. Town of NantucketDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- James Chongris and George Chongris v. Board of Appeals of the Town of AndoverCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Cloutier v. Town of EppingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Roslindale Motor Sales, Inc. v. Police Commr. of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Donnelly Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Historic Preservation Review BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Wayfield v. Town of TisburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.