Thompson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court’s denial of Huntley H. Thompson’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Thompson’s claims should have and could have been raised on direct appeal or in a timely filed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1241-42 (Fla.2004); Thomas v. State, 949 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).
Furthermore, the trial court did not err in denying the petition as a Rule 3.850 motion because Thompson has brought this issue before the trial court and this Court on multiple occasions. As such, it is successive and time-barred. Gamble v. State, 877…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Doorbal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Gamble v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- Comesanas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018