Legal Opinion

Comesanas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 6, 2018No. 3D18–554Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 2004) (holding that habeas corpus may not be used as a substitute for an otherwise procedurally-barred or time-barred motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850); Jenkins v. State, 6 So.3d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Thompson v. State, 994 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Griffin v. State, 976 So.2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Thomas v. State, 949 So.2d 319 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Barnard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API