Chirmside v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
In this appeal we are asked to approve an extension of the terminable interest doctrine to community contributions in a fully vested public retirement plan. We decline to so do and reverse the judgment herein.
The facts disclose that William and Irene Chirmside were married January 27, 1941. In 1946, William Chirmside commenced working for the San Bernardino City Water Department and on March 1, 1948, became a member of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS). On November 13, 1975, the parties were divorced. The final judgment of dissolution did not adjudicate the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re Marriage of AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- In Re Marriage of MastropaoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re Marriage of BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.