Legal Opinion
Gatz v. Life Time Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 28, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02691Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Joan Gatz, No. CV-24-02691-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Life Time Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Joan Gatz’s motion to amend the complaint. 16 (Doc. 26). Defendant Life Time Incorporated (“Life Time”)1 responded. (Doc. 29). The 17 Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See LRCiv 7.2(f). 18 For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion. 19 I. MOTION TO AMEND 20 Plaintiff seeks leave from this Court to amend…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Donald Newcombe v. Adolf Coors Company Foote, Cone and Belding and Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.