Legal Opinion
Rosenberg-Wohl v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 17, 2021No. 4:20-cv-09316Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KATHERINE ROSENBERG-WOHL, Case No. 20-cv-09316-DMR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY Re: Dkt. No. 11 COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Katherine Rosenberg-Wohl filed a complaint against State Farm Fire and Casualty 14 Company (“State Farm”), alleging it breached her State Farm homeowner’s insurance policy. 15 State Farm now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the first 16 amended complaint (“FAC”). [Docket No. 11.] This matter is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.