Legal Opinion

Bott v. Wurts

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court see 33 Vroom 107.

1Opinion of the Court

*290The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

Article 9 of the constitution of New Jersey,

ratified by the people August 13th, 1844, is as follows:

“Any specific amendment or amendments to the constitution may be proposed in the senate or general assembly, and if the same shall be agreed to by a majority of the members elected to each of the two houses, such proposed amendment or amendments shall be entered on their journals, with the yeas and nays taken thereon, and referred to the legislature then next to be chosen, and shall be published for three months previous to making such choice,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Koehler & Lange v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Collier v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  5. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Missouri · 1836

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. PentaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In re Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Devvy Kidd v. Carlos Cascos, Texas Secretary of State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Smith v. PentaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API