Legal Opinion

Randleman v. Boeres

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1928No. Docket No. 3538PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a two thousand dollar verdict of a jury rendered in an action for malicious prosecution instituted against the appellant on a charge of burglary. The record is devoid of substantial evidence to support the necessary elements of malice or lack of probable cause, and the judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

The appellant resided with her husband and daughter in a cottage at Huntington Park, Los Angeles. The respondent was twenty-two years of age and unmarried. He lived with his parents about a block from the residence of appellant. These…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Ricord v. Central Pacific RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Griswold v. GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Cooper v. ArmourU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark Equipment Co. v. WheatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Miller v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Moore v. DurrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Watzek v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Richard T. Wehrle v. Mrs. Oren BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API