Legal Opinion
Matter of Samuel Ginsburg, Individually and Trading as Jee-Jee Food Products, Bankrupt, Commercial Banking Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 7, 1958No. 12358_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the affirmance by the District Court of the Order of the Referee in Bankruptcy denying secured status to a creditor seeking to assert its judgment lien against machinery and equipment (“machinery”) in a building owned by the bankrupt and used by him for processing and packaging foods for wholesale.
The sole question presented is whether this machinery constituted real estate within the reach of a judgment lien.
The facts briefly stated are as follows:
The Commercial Banking Company (“Commercial”) obtained a recorded judgment 1 against Samuel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Titus v. Poland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Vail v. WeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Havens v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- In the Matter of the Estate of Van B. Hooper, Deceased. The Government of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Gottus v. Allegheny County Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- 222 Liberty Associates v. EESCO Electric, Inc. (In Re 222 Liberty Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Kaplan v. I. Kaplan, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.