Legal Opinion
Hinebaugh v. Wiley
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 30, 2001No. 9:98-cv-01184PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
KAHN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Respondent’s motion to dismiss and Petitioner’s motion to compel a polygraph test. For the following reasons, Respondent’s motion is DENIED and Petitioner’s motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Petitioner F. Lee Hinebaugh, filed the instant petition for habeas corpus in 1998. The petition alleges that, commencing in December 1996 and continuing through February 1998, various officials at the Federal Correctional Institution located in Ray Brook, New York'(“Ray Brook”) filed a series of false retaliatory incident reports…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colon v. AnnucciDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Homen v. HastyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Mason v. AlataryDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Reynolds v. PetrucciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Smith v. MDC Brooklyn WardenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025