Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Rosenberg
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Street, J.
Pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, petitioner, the District Attorney of New York County, seeks to enjoin and prohibit the respondent Judge and Judges of the Criminal Court of the City of New York from conducting a jury trial in the criminal cases now pending in such court against respondents Bowman and Puryear.
It appears from the papers before the court that on April 10, 1968, Bowman and Puryear, 18 and 19 years old, respectively, were arrested and arraigned in Criminal Court on charges of possession of burglar’s tools (Penal Law, § 140.35), a Class A misdemeanor, and criminal trespass in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richardson v. DudleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Milonas v. SchwalbNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. PettersonNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. RosenfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Day, New York County Courts1969