Legal Opinion
People v. Day
New York County Courts
Decided December 2, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmund A. McCarthy, J.
Both of the above-named defendants have been charged by the Grand Jury of Herkimer County with several counts of separate and distinct burglaries and larcenies. Both of them are under 19 years of age. Upon their arraignment, application was made for consideration as ‘ * youthful offenders ”. Under the New York State law the necessary consents were signed and investigations conducted and both of these defendants were found eligible to be treated as youthful offenders.
The above-mentioned consents to be investigated contained a waiver of a jury trial and provided for trial by the court. On the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nieves v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- People v. AnonymousNew York Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Joseph M.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
- In re Phillip S.New York City Family Court · 1974
- People v. William G.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1977