Legal Opinion

KLINGES v. POMERLEAU

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 11, 2022No. 2:19-cv-00418Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE TERESA KLINGES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:19-cv-00418-NT ) KEVIN POMERLEAU, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY AND TO STRIKE SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT WITNESS DESIGNATION On May 5, 2022, I heard oral arguments on the Plaintiff’s motions to exclude certain testimony of David E. Currier, the expert witness of Defendant Bergen & Parkinson (“B&P), (ECF No. 123) and to strike B&P’s supplemental expert witness designation (ECF No. 139). At the conclusion of those arguments, by oral order, I…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Esposito v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co., Scott Peckham v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Nieves-Villanueva v. Soto-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Harriman v. Hancock CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API