Legal Opinion

Greenblatt v. Richard Potasky Jeweler, Inc. (In Re Richard Potasky Jeweler, Inc.)

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 31, 1998No. Bankruptcy No. 93-31896, Nos. C-3-94-101, C-3-94-103, C-3-94-120 and C-3-94-541, Adversary Nos. 93-0151, 93-0214PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART THE ORDER OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT IN C-3-94-101, AFFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT IN C-3-94-103, REVERSING THE ORDER OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT IN C-3-94-120, AND REVERSING THE ORDER OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT IN C-3-94-541; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY; TERMINATION ENTRY ON EACH OF FOUR CAPTIONED CAUSES

RICE, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

“One of the primary purposes of the bankruptcy act is to ‘relieve the honest debtor from the weight of oppressive indebtedness and permit him to start afresh free from the obligations and…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re: Continental AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Dow Corning Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  3. In Re American Family EnterprisesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  4. In Re RoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
  5. In Re Mahoney Hawkes, LLPUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API