B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Shaffer

Fox, J.,

We have before us a motion for a new trial based upon the following reasons :

“1. The court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for judgment for want of a reply.

“2. The court erred in ruling that a reply was necessary.

■ “3. The court erred in refusing to withdraw a juror and allow the plaintiff to file a reply.”

The ease was called for trial, and after the jury was sworn counsel for the defendant made the following motion:

“And now, April 11, 1932, in accordance with the provisions of section 17 of the Practice Act of 1915, as amended by the Act of April 22, 1929, P. L. 627,…