Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Williams v. Miller Pontiac Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1966No. 24432PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

This is an action for damages, both actual and punitive, alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs Thomas C. and Carol Williams, husband and wife, as a result of fraud practiced upon them by defendant Miller Pontiac Company in connection with the sale to them of an automobile.

Early in April, 1963, the plaintiffs, residents of Grandview, Jackson County, Missouri, decided to purchase a new 1963 Pontiac Tempest LeMans hardtop coupe. Pursuant to such plan Mr. Williams went to the Laner Pontiac Company, Kansas City, Missouri, a dealer and distributor of Pontiac…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powers v. ShoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Jones v. West Side Buick Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Finke v. BoyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Herrold v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Bolten v. ColburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ray Dodge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Danforth v. Independence Dodge, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. ZD Howard Company v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Crabb v. Mid-American Dairymen, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API