Legal Opinion
Auerbach v. Great Western Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1999No. B116276PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
In a suit that raises several issues concerning the type of out-of-pocket expenses which will suffice to support fraud damages, respondents Ernest and Lisa Auerbach (the Auerbachs) brought suit against appellant Great Western Bank (GW) claiming that it fraudulently promised to negotiate a modification to an existing loan agreement in order to induce them to continue to make payments on the loan. Because we conclude that the Auerbachs are incorrect in their assumption that an existing nonrecourse agreement precluded GW from pursuing them individually if they defaulted on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Racine & Laramie, Ltd. v. Department of Parks & RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Shelly Feldman, Individually and D/B/A Shelly Feldman Associates v. Allegheny International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Conrad v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fladeboe v. American Isuzu Motors Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Behr v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Copeland v. Baskin Robbins U.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.