Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Michael A. Woods, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 21, 1993No. 92-CA-1529-S, 92-CA-1712-S, 92-CA-1761-SPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWERTON, Judge.

The City of Louisville appeals from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Second Division, in which Judge Edmund P. Karem declared City of Louisville Ordinance § 111.-053 invalid as being in conflict with KRS 244.120 and 804 KAR 5:060. The cross-appellants, Michael A. Woods, Inc., d/b/a The Godfather; and Envy, Inc., d/b/a Dancers West, present an issue we need not consider. They complain that the trial court denied their motion to alter the judgment and declare additional ordinances invalid. The trial court did not decide the issues, and we will indicate now that we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Do, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Whitehead v. Estate of Ray BravardKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pierce v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lewis v. Ken-Pad, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. TBCH, INC. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Blue Movies, Inc. v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kelly v. City of Fort Thomas, KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
  4. Blue Movies, Inc. v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  5. City of Ashland v. Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API