Legal Opinion

Sergent v. Anne Arundel County, Md.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 3, 2010No. Case PWG-08-1286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.

This Memorandum and Order addresses Plaintiffs Frieda L. Sergent, individually and as the personal representative of the Estate of Gene A. Sergent, and John A. Turkette’s Motion for New Trial, Paper No. 82; Defendant Anne Arundel County’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for New Trial, Paper No. 83. Plaintiff has not filed a reply, and the time for doing so has passed. Local Rule 105.2.a. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial is DENIED. This Memorandum and Order disposes of Paper Nos. 82 and 83.

I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lynne S. Taylor, and Keisha Johnson v. Virginia Union University, Keisha Johnson, and Lynne S. Taylor v. Virginia Union UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Connie Sue Heater, United States of America v. Harvey Bernard John, United States of America v. Timothy W. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Tri-State Truck & Equipment Co. v. StaufferCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Atkinson Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Balt. Police Dep'tDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  2. Sardis v. Overhead Door CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API