Legal Opinion

Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Nevada-California Transportation Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1938No. 3147PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This suit was instituted by the respondents to enjoin appellant from operating motor vehicles on the public highways of Nevada between Reno and Tonopah, and intermediate points, in competition with respondents, upon the ground that appellant had not obtained from the public service commission a certificate of convenience and necessity, as required by chapter 165, Stats. 1933, and chapter 109, Stats. 1919.

From an adverse judgment the defendant has appealed.

The parties entered into an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that the Tonopah & Goldfield…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. MeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Van Pelt v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  4. Michigan Trust Co. v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Las Vegas v. AckermanNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Damus v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Nevada v. Lincoln County Power District No. 1Nevada Supreme Court · 1941
  4. McCormick v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Westinghouse Beverage Group, Inc. v. Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API