Magoba Management, Inc. v. Central Zone Property Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The pertinent allegations of the complaint are substantially as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant H. Clayton Smith & Co., Inc. (both duly licensed real estate brokers) entered into an agreement to act as cobrokers and to use their joint efforts to obtain a purchaser for certain specific real estate in New York City, and they agreed to share equally the brokerage commissions payable for procuring such a purchaser. Thereafter, ‘ ‘ Smith, in its own name, but, in fact, as co-broker with plaintiff, entered into an agreement with [the defendant] Central Zone [Property Corporation] whereby…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- O. A. Skutt, Inc. v. J. & H. Goodwin, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Benedict v. PellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Barrett v. LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Barrett v. LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spivak v. Madison-54th Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1969
- Weniger v. Union Center Plaza AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974