Legal Opinion

Magoba Management, Inc. v. Central Zone Property Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The pertinent allegations of the complaint are substantially as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant H. Clayton Smith & Co., Inc. (both duly licensed real estate brokers) entered into an agreement to act as cobrokers and to use their joint efforts to obtain a purchaser for certain specific real estate in New York City, and they agreed to share equally the brokerage commissions payable for procuring such a purchaser. Thereafter, ‘ ‘ Smith, in its own name, but, in fact, as co-broker with plaintiff, entered into an agreement with [the defendant] Central Zone [Property Corporation] whereby…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. O. A. Skutt, Inc. v. J. & H. Goodwin, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Benedict v. PellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Barrett v. LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Barrett v. LangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spivak v. Madison-54th Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Weniger v. Union Center Plaza AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API