Legal Opinion

Spivak v. Madison-54th Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1969PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, seeks to recover a commission allegedly due upon a tenant’s exercise of an option to renew its lease. The defendants assert two essential defenses: (a) lack of privity under the contract of brokerage between plaintiff and Weylin Building Company, the original owner of the leasehold, and (b) tenant’s failure to effectively exercise the option and take possession of the premises for the renewal period.

The leasehold involves two floors in an office building with many subtenants. The brokerage agreement between plaintiff and the owner, executed on March 1, 1956,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Gillette Bros. v. Aristocrat Restaurant, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Stern v. Gepo Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. HirschfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Longley-Jones Associates, Inc. v. Ircon Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Thorne Real Estate, Inc. v. NezelekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Coggins v. JosephMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Eastern Associates, Inc. v. SarubinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API