Legal Opinion

United States v. Cifuentes

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 17, 1981No. 40,820; ACM 22745PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

After a number of charges had been preferred against him, appellant offered to enter into a pretrial agreement. Under that offer, “[t]he Convening Authority will not approve a sentence to exceed a Dishonorable Discharge, total forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to the grade of airman basic (El-1) and confinement at hard labor for two years.” Additionally, “Charge IV and the Specification thereunder will be dismissed.” The offer having been accepted by the convening authority, appellant proceeded to enter pleas of guilty to the first three charges against him,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. KazenaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. CifuentesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. AlbertUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. MullerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. EnglertNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. CombsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. HoltU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API