Legal Opinion

Edelson v. Ch'ien

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 11, 2005No. 03 C 7320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ST. EYE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Harry Edelson (“Edelson”) filed his Second Amended Complaint alleging tortious interference with prospective economic advantage against Defendants Raymond K.F. Ch’ien (“Ch’ien”), Peter Yip Hak Yung (‘Tip”), Asia Pacific Online, Ltd. (“Asia Pacific”), and chinadotcom corporation (“Chinadotcom”). Ch’ien moves to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), and for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and in the alternative, to strike immaterial matter, pursuant to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. BioValve Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  2. George S. May International Co. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Hyperquest, Inc. v. NuGen I.T., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  4. Bovinett v. HomeAdvisor, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API