Legal Opinion
State v. Demeter
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 7, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
SHEBELL, J.A.D.
Defendant Peter A. Demeter appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress incriminating evidence seized as a result of a warrantless search of his automobile. This evidence was used to support his conviction of possession of a controlled dangerous substance (methamphetamine) in violation of N.J.S.A. 24:21-20(a)(1).
*116At the suppression hearing, a patrolman of the Belvidere Police Department testified that he was on patrol duty on the evening of March 1, 1987, when defendant’s van passed with its license plate light out. He signaled…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DemeterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Russell v. CoyleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993