Legal Opinion
Russell v. Coyle
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 4, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
266 N.J. Super. 651 (1993)
630 A.2d 396
DAVID RUSSELL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE T. COYLE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 3, 1993.
Decided August 4, 1993.
Before Judges KING, LANDAU and THOMAS.
Vincent P. Manning argued the cause for appellant (Schottland, Vernon, Aaron, Plaza, Costanzo & Manning, attorneys; Michael D. Schottland, of counsel; Mr. Manning, on the brief).
James D. Harris, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Harris, on the brief).
The opinion of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hart v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Bernstein v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- State v. GoreeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000