State v. Deer
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, R.J.
Roger Deer appeals his conviction of two counts of enticing a child for immoral purposes, sec. 940.32(2), Stats. He claims (1) the evidence introduced was insufficient to convict him of either count; (2) the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the element of custody, and (3) improper juror conduct occurred mandating mistrial. For the reasons discussed below, we disagree with all of Deer’s arguments. Deer also maintains that the trial court’s failure to consider a sentence reduction requires a remand for consideration of this issue. We observe no grounds for a remand.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barstad v. FrazierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ShillcuttWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Lacher v. VenusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. MacEmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TruaxCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Weborg v. JennyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ScherreiksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.