Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 29, 2005No. A05A0867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

The State of Georgia appeals from the trial court’s order holding that $10,720 in United States currency was not subject to forfeiture and should be returned to Demond L. Stovall and his mother, Judy Richardson. The State contends that the trial court erred by holding (1) that Stovall and Richardson had standing as claimants to contest the forfeiture and (2) that the search of the residence where the funds were seized was illegal. We agree with the State that Stovall and Richardson lacked standing to contest the forfeiture because they failed to meet their burden of establishing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foskey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Bohannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. McFarley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. MYSPACE, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. In the Interest of A. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API