Legal Opinion

Chee Chong & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 3, 1915No. 1471PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36300 (T. D. 34727) and G. A. 7602 (T. D. 34788).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Fish fried in lard and packed in tins with salt was classified by the collector' of customs at the port of San Francisco as “other *557fish in tins” and was assessed for duty at 30 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 270 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph reads as follows:

270. Fish, (except shellfish) by whatever name known, packed in oil, in bottles, jars, kegs, tin boxes, or cans, shall be dutiable as follows: When in packages containing seven and one-half cubic inches or less, one and one-half cents per bottle, jar, keg, box, or can; containing more than seven and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Loggie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API