Legal Opinion
In re: Flyers Rights Education Fund, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 3, 2023No. 22-1004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 12, 2022 Decided March 3, 2023 No. 22-1004 IN RE: FLYERS RIGHTS EDUCATION FUND, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS FLYERSRIGHTS.ORG AND PAUL HUDSON, PETITIONERS On Petition for Writ of Mandamus Michael T. Kirkpatrick argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the petition for a writ of mandamus and the reply was Allison M. Zieve. Martin Totaro, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondents. On the opposition to the petition for writ of mandamus was Mark B. Stern, Attorney. Before: WALKER,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carol Vorchheimer v. Philadelphian Owners AssociatiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- In Re: CheneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Loving v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- In re: Center for Biological DiversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- In re: National Nurses UnitedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Application of the Randolph-Sheppard Act to the United States Mint, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2024
- Cavagnuolo v. BecerraDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026