Legal Opinion

Cavagnuolo v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 18, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2023-3369Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARLENE CAVAGNUOLO, as the Executrix of the Estate of JOSEPH CAVAGNUOLO, Plaintiff, Case No. 23-cv-3369-CKK-MJS v. ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., Secretary of Health and Human Services, 1 Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This case is about the proper interpretation of the term “covered part D drug” in the Medicare statute. To drill down even more, the parties’ competing interpretations hinge largely on the meaning of the word “includes.” Under the relevant statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1395w–102(e)(1), a “covered part D drug” is one associated…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API