Legal Opinion

City of Lowell v. Archambault

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 8, 1905PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

This is a bill in equity brought under the R. L. c. 102, § 71, to enjoin the defendant from occupying and using a stable in violation of the provisions of § 69 of the same chapter. In the Superior Court the case was submitted on agreed facts, and a decree was entered in favor of the plaintiff. The case comes before us on an appeal by the defendant.

It appears that the defendant, who is engaged in the business of an undertaker, desiring to erect on his land a stable to be used in connection therewith, applied to the board of health for *71a license to permit him to occupy and use the building when…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PlaistedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. BraudyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Schwuchow v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. City of Newton v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Commonwealth v. KinsleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Burgess v. Mayor of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. General Baking Co. v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Commissioners of Public Works v. Cities Service Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Rehmann v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API