Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kinsley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 2, 1882PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

The defendant was complained of for unlawfully keeping, in a building occupied by him in Millbury, a table for the purpose of playing at pool for hire, gain and reward, without authority or license therefor.

By the Gen. Sts. c. 88, §§ 69-72, as amended by the St. of 1880, c. 94, the selectmen in towns are authorized to grant licenses for such a table, but' “ such license may be revoked at the pleasure of the authority granting it; ” and all persons are prohibited, under a penalty, from keeping such a table without a license.

A license had been duly granted to the defendant, and it had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FredericksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lodes v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Burgess v. Mayor of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Darling Apartment Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Zugravu v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State Ex Relator McNamara v. ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API