Legal Opinion

Thayer v. Glynn

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action op Tort for negligence. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the April Term, 1918, Windham County, Fish, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case. Compromises are favored in the law; and statements of this nature are privileged, and inadmissible in evidence on grounds of public policy.

Read the full summary

Action op Tort for negligence. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the April Term, 1918, Windham County, Fish, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case. Compromises are favored in the law; and statements of this nature are privileged, and inadmissible in evidence on grounds of public policy. Bias v. Consolidated Lighting Go., 73 Vt. 35; Doon v. Raven, 49 Vt. 294; Chichering v. Brooks, 61 Vt. 554; Moore v. Hill, 62 Vt. 424; Ealus v. Bass, 122 Md. 467, Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 1918 E, note at p. 439.

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover damages to his person and property resulting from the negligent operation of the defendant’s automobile. While the evidence was sharply conflicting, that favoring the plaintiff tended to show that the collision between the plaintiff’s team and the defendant’s automobile was due to the negligence of the latter in driving on the wrong side of the road, as alleged in the decláration. The accident occurred on the' evening of October 29, 1916, at a point in the highway between Bellows Falls and Saxtons River called the Rhodes Curve, and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Burg v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Ide v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  4. Bradish v. BlissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  5. Rea v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API