Legal Opinion

In re Chariff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1998Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was suspended from practice by this Court in November 1995 for a period of six months (Matter of Chariff, 221 AD2d 719).

On July 9, 1997, his application for reinstatement was denied because he had failed to submit necessary information and documentation (Matter of Chariff, 241 AD2d 621). He now renews his application.

An examination of the papers submitted on this reapplication indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ChariffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re ChariffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API