Legal Opinion

BYRON v. COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01365Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS A. BYRON, 2:21-CV-01365-CCW Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA GAS OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant. OPINION Plaintiff Curtis A. Byron claims that his employer, Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania,1 discriminated against him on the basis of his age by failing to promote him to the position of Field Operations Leader, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C. § 621

et seq. and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. See generally ECF No. 1. In its Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API