Legal Opinion

Goodrum v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1985No. Nos. A14-85-103-CR, B14-85-119-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JUNELL, Justice.

Randy Edward Goodrum appeals convictions for forgery and burglary. After the jury rendered guilty verdicts, the court assessed punishment at 15 years imprisonment on each offense. Appellant brings four grounds of error: (1) the evidence of forgery was insufficient to show appellant possessed the requisite intent to harm or defraud, (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish appellant committed a burglary, (3) the element of ownership of a building was never established to prove burglary and (4) the trial court erred in sentencing appellant to a term of years…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bogany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Chambers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1982
  4. Salas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Meade v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Gaddie, James Willard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  3. Mildred Griffin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API