Legal Opinion

Bogany v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1983No. 317-83PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

ODOM, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery. On a finding of one prior conviction for enhancement, punishment was assessed at 60 years and a $10,000 fine. The Court of Appeals found this punishment verdict was unauthorized by law because under V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 12.42(c), no fine was authorized. It then reformed the verdict under Art. 44.24(b), V.A.C.C.P., and overruled the ground of error. We granted the petition for review to consider appellant’s challenge to the Court of Appeals’ authority to reform the verdict.

Art.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McIverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Milczanowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. King v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ex Parte SpauldingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API