Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1962No. 35064PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, confinement in jail for ninety days.

The record is before us without a statement of facts

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal, presented by formal bill of exception, is that the trial court committed reversible error in receiving from the jury a question asking for further instructions as to a matter of law and in replying to such request in writing without bringing the jury into the courtroom and making such reply, in open court.

The bill ef exception certifies that after the jury had retired to, consider…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guajardo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Lamkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Heald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Walter Prater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Allaben v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Arrevalo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Clinton Drake Daugherty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API