Legal Opinion

Wright v. KECH-TV

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1985No. 133,264; CA A28750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to compel the removal of defendant KECH-TV’s transmission tower from land in an exclusive farm use zone. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss on the ground that the Land Use Board of Appeals has exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over the questions presented in the action. Plaintiffs appeal, and we affirm.

Defendants installed the tower and related facilities in October, 1981, after receiving the necessary permits from Marion County. The county did not conduct quasi-judicial proceedings in connection with its issuance of the permits, because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Monmouth City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Bryant v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. McCoy v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Mehring v. ArpkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Wright v. KECH-TVOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API