Legal Opinion
Dane Hidden v. Day & Zimmerman/Florida Power & Light etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 7, 2016No. 1D16-1045PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant argues that the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erroneously (1) excluded certain medical evidence, and (2) failed to rule on his entitlement to indemnity benefits. We affirm the second issue without further comment, and we affirm the first issue for the reasons that follow.
Factual and Procedural Background
Claimant alleged that he developed a sudden pain in his neck when opening heavy lids on equipment lockers at work on May 22, 2015. Although Claimant lost consciousness, no injury was readily observable. Claimant was transported by ambulance to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parodi v. Florida Contracting Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Miller Electric Co. v. OurslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Carmack v. State, Department of AgricultureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Boggs v. USA Water Ski, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Romano v. Trinity School for ChildrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hansen And Adkins Auto Transport and Gallagher Bassett Services v. James MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Meghan Anderson v. Broward County Sheriff's Office and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018