Hawkins v. M & J Finance Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendant insists that the plaintiff’s conduct in delivering his certificates of title to used-car dealer Thorne, endorsed in blank, was sufficient, when considered with the rest of the evidence adduced below, to estop the plaintiff from asserting title to the two motor vehicles as against the chattel mortgage made by Thorne to the defendant Finance Company.
Decision here turns on whether the trial court erred in failing to submit to the jury this question of estoppel.
The doctrine of estoppel by conduct- — estoppel in pais — rests upon principles of equity. It is designed to aid the law in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Stone v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Pearl v. Interstate Securities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953