Legal Opinion

Farrar Brown Company v. Johnson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 2, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTapley, J.

On appeal. Plaintiff, Farrar Brown Company, is registered as a retailer under the Maine Sales and Use Tax Law. It is primarily a wholesaler of automotive supplies and general merchandise. It operates 8 branches in addition to its main office located in Portland. In March of 1960 the State Tax Assessor made a deficiency sales tax assessment against Farrar Brown Company and later in June of 1960, after a hearing on a petition for reconsideration, the Tax Assessor reduced the amount of the assessment to $861.52. The plaintiff appealed the reduced assessment to the Superior Court, within and for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Harriman v. SpauldingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  3. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Bouchard v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  5. Scott Paper Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jim L. Shetakis Distributing Co. v. State, Department of TaxationNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bud's Red & White Super Markets v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API